One year following the official implementation of ICD-10, the coding industry is beginning to report valid results regarding accuracy, productivity, and denial trends. While some of these facts and figures are self-reported by HIM directors and anecdotal in nature, other findings are grounded in hard, fast coding performance data. Such is the case with the results from Central Learning (www.centrallearning.com), a web-based system that electronically assesses coder knowledge using real medical record cases and expert-verified answer keys.
This article summarizes coder performance data as measured across 50 health systems and 300 coders as of June 30, 2016. It compares these findings with other industry reports and extrapolates key findings for HIM directors and revenue cycle executives. Since coding and diagnosis-related group (DRG) assignment are the major drivers behind health system revenue streams, consistent data analysis helps to ensure accurate coding and reimbursement.
According to Central Learning data, coding accuracy is slightly increasing after nine months under ICD-10 for both experienced coders and coders-in-training. While the industry overall still lags behind the 95% accuracy benchmark achieved in ICD-9, we're getting closer in all three major patient types: inpatient, outpatient, and emergency services.
Fifty health systems are represented in the data, providing a broad-based assessment. We compared coder accuracy from Q1 (January 1?March 31) with Q2 (April 1?June 30) to identify recent, timely trends in code quality. The figure on p. 13 lists the most current benchmark of our status through June 30, 2016.
The May 2016 issue of Perspectives outlined 225 hospital requirements from the accreditation manual?nine from the Information Management (IM) chapter and five from the Record of Care, Treatment and Services (RC) chapter?that have been deleted. This initiative is part of the Joint Commission's project REFRESH and improving the survey process.
For approximately 10 years, HIMB has been gathering data about the HIM profession through its annual salary survey. This survey often gives us a glimpse into the responsibilities of HIM professionals, but focuses primarily on the education, experience, and salary of those in the HIM field.
Time and again, the salary survey reveals that HIM directors and managers are wearing many hats and asked to oversee an increasing number of tasks. In an effort to dig a bit deeper into HIM departments, HIMB conducted its first HIM roles and responsibilities survey.
More than half of respondents were HIM directors (26%) or managers (25%), whereas the remaining 49% held other revenue cycle positions. Of the latter group, 50% were coders and 29% were CDI specialists. Responses also came in from transcriptionists, privacy officers, compliance officers, revenue integrity professionals, and consultants.
HIM demographics
The plurality of respondents work in acute care hospitals (55%) and critical access hospitals (17%) or have a corporate position at a multi-system hospital (8%). Other settings represented in the survey include long-term acute care hospitals, psychiatric/behavioral health hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, ambulatory surgery centers, and physician practices.
The May 2016 issue of Perspectives outlined 225 hospital requirements from the accreditation manual?nine from the Information Management (IM) chapter and five from the Record of Care, Treatment and Services (RC) chapter?that have been deleted. This initiative is part of the Joint Commission's project REFRESH and improving the survey process.
The fiscal year (FY) 2017 IPPS final rule was released August 2 and will be published in the Federal Register August 22. The majority of the finalized updates are consistent with those outlined in the proposed rule, but with a few refinements to applicable time periods. The final rule expands and refines the number of claims-based outcomes linked to payment under these programs.
Effective October 1, 2017, performance for cost and quality measures in the HRRP, HVBP, and HACRP will impact up to 6% of your hospital's inpatient acute Medicare fee-for-service reimbursement.
So, where to begin? First, become familiar with the measure specifications and risk-adjustment methodologies, in addition to existing CMS provided reports on historical performance, to gain insights into your organization's clinical documentation and coding vulnerabilities.
The cost of healthcare is quickly rising across the nation, and patients are shouldering the majority of the price increases through higher deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses as expenditures continue to shift from employers to patients. According to a TransUnion Healthcare report released during HFMA's 2016 National Institute in Las Vegas (www.marketwired.com/press-release/-2137926.htm), patients experienced a 13% increase in medical costs between 2014 and 2015.
A rise in self-pay patients usually signifies an increase in bad debt risk that can have a sharp and negative effect on revenue streams. As expected, healthcare organizations responded to this upward trend in patient financial responsibility by dedicating more attention and resources to managing their self-pay accounts. But are additional complications necessary? Can self-pay accounts be managed more effectively by actually taking fewer and more logical steps?
Recent work with pre-acute care providers, such as emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency medicine physician groups, reveals that most of these providers are struggling to address self-pay accounts. Hospitals and health systems report similar concerns. Addressing the rise in self-pay patients requires a shift change in revenue cycle management strategies and tactics.
Instead of raising the level of complexity required to manage self-pay receivables, providers should try to simplify efforts?work smarter, not harder. Determining patient propensity to pay is one of these practical steps. Using the pre-acute care sector as one example, qualification for accounts management can be radically simplified with significantly fewer steps.
The accurate capture of acute respiratory failure has been a long-standing challenge for CDI programs. The accurate reporting of this condition as a post-procedural event can be even more difficult.
Q: What recommendations do you have for handling medical records for staff members who are also patients at the organization where they work? Should we provide extra protection for these patients? What can we do to ensure that staff members are not accessing their coworkers' records without permission or need?
A: I am a firm believer in not adding special protection to any record, because it implies that some records are more confidential than others. In fact, all records are confidential and staff should not access any record unless it is necessary to do so to do their jobs. And, if it is necessary, they should only access the minimum necessary to do the job. HIPAA requires access monitoring, so your organization should conduct routine audits to determine whether staff are accessing records without a work-related reason. There is now software available that can conduct routine audits by staff member and department. This software can be used to reassure staff that their information is not being accessed by coworkers and to hold accountable those who are not following the policy/law. When a staff member raises a concern, an audit should be run to determine whether inappropriate access has occurred, and if it has, sanctions should be applied. Organizations should also consider having a policy that staff should not handle coworkers' (or family members') records (except in an emergency) without the permission of their supervisor.
All of these points should be reviewed at orientation and during (at minimum) annual training to ensure all staff understand that the organization takes such transgressions seriously and will take action as needed to protect the privacy of every patient's information.
Observation hours start accruing not when the patient comes into the hospital, but when the physician writes the order for observation. Observation hours end when all medically neces¬sary services related to observation are complete.
