I was recently discussing the state of EHRs in regard to the poor quality of the documentation with a colleague who has been a practicing HIM professional for more than 35 years and currently works for a large group of hospitals as the coding director.
Phase 2 of OCR's HIPAA audit program is coming down the pipeline, and although privacy and security officers are typically tasked with all things HIPAA, there's a seat at the table for HIM when it comes to preparing for audits.
As more hospitals adopt EHRs over paper records, the amount of data stored electronically steadily increases. However, the usefulness of this data diminishes if it does not translate to meaningful information that hospitals can use for operations surrounding registration, treatment, billing, coding, and research.
CMS has sharply accelerated its push toward moving outpatient payments from a fee-for-service model to a true prospective payment system with a number of its proposals in the 2016 OPPS proposed rule (https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-16577.pdf), including new comprehensive APCs (C-APC) and extensive APC consolidation and reconfiguration.
Educating coders and clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists on CMS claims-based measures is essential in today's value-based payment environment. Empowered with an understanding of measure specifications and risk adjustment methodologies, a strong CDI program can effectively address opportunities to improve quality profiles and associated hospital revenue.
Finding themselves at the center of a tumultuous, dynamic healthcare environment, physicians are becoming increasingly frustrated and anxious, frequently questioning their career choice. Preparation to be a lifelong healthcare provider inadequately prepares clinicians for the emerging value-based healthcare world to which they are being subjected. Physicians believe that they have little control over or input into the metrics that are rapidly determining their fates with healthcare organizations, third-party payers, and inevitably patients themselves.
In the first article in this series, we provided an introduction and overview of the PSI 90 measure, which is included in two CMS pay-for-performance programs. Because PSI 90 is a claims-based measure, performance is largely determined by ICD-9-CM codes on the claims.
